Letters to the Editor

Letter: The Herald should have supported Maier

By
Wednesday, October 21, 2015

To the Editor:

I write to express my disappointment with The Herald’s unwillingness to support M. Dzhali Maier ’17, its embattled staff columnist, and publicly defend both its commitment to free speech and editorial independence. Responses to Maier’s columns by students and administrators correctly emphasize The Herald’s salience and influence on this campus, if only to rebuke it. However, The Herald’s influence makes its commitment to the freedom of expression that much more vital. The seat of public debate and argument at Brown resides in its pages. It has a responsibility to protect and defend that space against calls for “accountability” to activist student groups.

The Herald has also betrayed its obligation publicly to support its columnists, no matter how incendiary their views. A newspaper protects its writers publicly, even if it disagrees with them. It is unfair for a newspaper not to share the risk of bad press with its columnist. Instead of defending Maier and its editorial judgment, this paper has discredited and embarrassed itself by equivocation and apology.

In March 2001, The Herald published a full-page advertisement by conservative activist David Horowitz opposing reparations for African-Americans. In response to the hue and cry of angered students, this newspaper asserted its right to print whatever it saw fit and even went so far as to reprint and redistribute the paper after protestors removed 4,000 copies of the Friday edition from campus newsstands. Now, it refuses even to speak in its own defense.

Once college newspapers cherished their editorial independence. Now they have become their own censors.

Nicholas Geiser GS

PhD candidate in political science

  • 0.159

    Maier made an extremely milquetoast case for the obvious reality of race, only to get “corrected” by an editorial unironically citing the New York Times. Not much later, a washed up Anthro professor chimed in and spouted more creationist word salad about how human culture supposedly has nothing to do with the biology that enables it.

    Take note: You don’t help your case by being polite and amicable to people who deny basic evolutionary principles, they’ll slur you as a racist no matter what you say.