To the Editor: There is a major flaw in Monday’s column “Brown voters can do better” that should be addressed.
Letters to the Editor
There are many gates at Brown and even more gatekeepers — explicit and implicit — that contribute to the University’s history of institutional racism.
We have exceptional faculty, a stunning campus and a curriculum that attracts intellectually independent students.
The perspective in yesterday’s Herald op-ed is appreciated but fails to convince of the faults of a financial prescription that focuses on enhancing Brown.
I’m disappointed by the recent op-ed’s framing of UCS’ work toward informing our new members of Brown’s context as part of a conspiring liberal agenda.
Grace Johnson’s ’19 column (“Pets should be for everyone,” Sept. 26) in yesterday’s paper was poorly thought out, insensitive and under-researched.
As an alum of The Herald and longtime newspaperman, I was gratified that The Herald had guts enough to publish “Lamp/Bear sucks,” by Daniel Meyer ’17.
I found Daniel Meyer’s ’17 column, “Lamp/Bear sucks,” of Sept. 16 offensive.
Tisch’s shamelessly money-minded letter in response to Daniel Meyer’s ’17 column ought to inspire fear and outrage from students and faculty members alike.
The financial pressures faced by low-income undergraduate researchers are real, and the Department of Computer Science is working to mitigate them.