Subscribe to The Brown Daily Herald Newsletter

Sign up for The Brown Daily Herald’s daily newsletter to stay up to date with what is happening at Brown and on College Hill no matter where you are right now!


He said, she can’t remember: the Adam Lack case

Wednesday, September 22, 2004

On the night of February 3, 1996, a first-year drank with her girlfriends before heading to a party at Delta Tau. A few hours later, a male junior found the girl lying next to a pool of vomit and helped her to his room.

The next morning, the young woman woke up, gave the young man her phone number and walked back to her room. He called her several times and, eventually, they spoke on the phone. He told her they had had sex and talked into the wee hours of the morning. She said she had no recollection of the evening after arriving at the party. She asked if he had used a condom, and he said he had.

Five weeks later, the woman filed a complaint with the Office of Student Life in March 1996, accusing the man of sexual misconduct. She admitted she could not remember the events of the evening, but felt she must have been too intoxicated to consciously consent to sex. He claimed he did not realize the young woman was drunk, and that she had initiated their sexual encounter.

The girl was Sara Klein ’99. The number of faculty, administrators and students who remember that name dwindles as the years pass by.

The guy was Adam Lack. Few who were on campus at the time have forgotten his name, or the spectacle created by the allegations against him.

The Adam Lack case began and ended with confusion and for a time, at least, completely overtook the lives of its participants, including Brown administrators and professors who became involved. It was a difficult case; much more complicated then a “he said, she said.” It was, as many pointed out at the time in the pages of The Herald, a case of “he said, she can’t remember.”

But the incredible staying power and national significance of the Adam Lack case lies in the fact it coincided with a particular moment in the United States when “political correctness” was a point of ridicule.

Adam Lack represents different things to different people. Brown faculty or alumni might recall how his case brought to light the inner workings of the University’s disciplinary process, sparking a fierce debate over how colleges should mediate disputes between their students. For some, Lack is associated with the excesses of feminism; for others, his name is a catalyst for activism against date rape and relationship abuse.

Adam Lack became a euphemism, one could say, just when euphemisms were supposed to be going out of style.

Tonight on 20/20: “When Yes Means No”

The Lack case truly exploded at Brown in the fall of 1996 after Lack’s one-semester suspension was downgraded to a guilty conviction for “flagrant disrespect.” Those who believed he was a convicted rapist were disgusted, while those who thought he had been unfairly targeted by campus feminists wished to see him exonerated. A student group called Coalition Against Sexual Assault formed to advocate for more support services for victims and a greater awareness of sexual assault on campus.

On January 29, 1997, ABC 20/20 correspondent John Stossel arrived at Brown to film a piece on the controversy. CASA organized a rally to coincide with the event, hoping to present for the cameras a campus unified against sexual assault.

The rally turned ugly when instead of simply filming the events and interviewing students, Stossel grabbed a microphone and asked the protestors to define rape.

“To me it’s a man holding a woman at gunpoint or knifepoint,” he said. “There seems to be a new way of looking at it. I’d like some of you to talk to me about it.”

The rally devolved into a shouting match between Stossel and several students, who accused him of manipulating the news.

When Stossel’s report aired in March of that year, it was titled “When Yes Means No,” and featured footage of angry students, including Klein, screaming. On air, Stossel announced, “There is something of an authoritarian atmosphere surrounding women’s issues on this campus.”

T.V. viewers saw Brown presented as a PC-netherworld filled with angry activists out to frame the innocent. Campus feminists, Stossel’s piece concluded, were authoritarian and unwilling to accept critiques of their women-as-victims mentality.

“Politics of the ugliest kind”

For Professor of Music David Josephson, Stossel’s portrait of Brown in the mid-1990s is not far from the truth, despite questionable reporting tactics.

“This was such a roused campus when it came to girls and boys,” said Josephson, who still keeps multiple folders full of documentation from the Lack case in his office. “It was drenched in gender politics of the ugliest kind.”

When Klein accused Lack of having sex with her against her will, campus feminists reliant on the woman-as-victim trope swung into action without considering the merits of Klein’s case against Lack, Josephson argued.

Professor of History Carolyn Dean, who is also a member of the Gender Studies faculty, arrived at Brown in 1993 and remembers the mid-1990s not as a time of excess, but as a moment when Brown women were confronted with new challenges within the feminist movement and heated sexual politics on campus.

“Feminism became more widely a part of undergraduate women’s lives,” following the “rape list” controversy and several other sexual harassment scandals in the early 1990s, Dean recalled.

Feminists at Brown, Dean said, were not stereotypically “against the institution,” but rather were working in tandem with the University to create a safer climate for women and other minority groups.

It is this very partnership between campus feminists and the administration, particularly the Office of Student Life, that Josephson holds responsible for the fate of Adam Lack, whom he had never met nor heard of until May 1996, when the UDC’s guilty ruling in Lack’s sexual misconduct case was announced on the front page of a special edition of The Herald.

“I had a feeling this man did nothing wrong,” Josephson said, “that he was being lynched by the feminist mob on campus.”

In one of his letters to The Herald in the fall of 1996 defending Lack, Josephson wrote that gender discrimination did not exist at Brown. Dean, who speaks often of discrimination against women in the tenure-granting process, responded to Josephson in writing, earning a page in one of his folders of Lack miscellany.

Today, Dean laughs when reminded that she stepped into the fray with Josephson, recalling how the Lack case galvanized some faculty members to become involved in student politics in a way that rarely occurs.

“I have no idea what happened on that night,” Dean said, pointing out that in actuality, no one on earth other than Lack himself knows the truth about what happened on Feb. 3, 1996 since the UDC hearings in the Lack case were closed and Klein admittedly did not remember the events of the evening.

The cloud of uncertainty surrounding the Lack proceedings is what made the case so attractive to campus activists and the national media alike, Dean said. “It became symbolic of a whole set of larger concerns and issues.”

Brown moves on

The battleground of the PC-wars shifted in the late 1990s, as a new breed of Brown scandals centered not around sexuality, but race.

Still, Dean and student activists caution against adopting an attitude of complacency toward sexual assault at Brown. Diana Brazzell ’04 of the Coalition Against Relationship Abuse said CARA has worked with the administration to advocate increased resources for victims of sexual assault and relationship abuse.

On CARA’s agenda are issues that were central to the Lack case eight years ago: clearer definitions of sexual assault and relationship violence within Brown’s disciplinary code and smoother response mechanisms once a student brings a sexual assault or abuse problem to the University’s attention.

Brazzell said being involved with sexual assault activism has made her aware of how far Brown still has to go in terms of dealing with this issue.

“There are cases of students who were raped and didn’t want to report it because they felt they wouldn’t be believed,” she said. “Students report problems happening on their hall of harassment and assault and in the end, the person who reported is the one who gets moved.”

Students, Brazzell said, must dispatch stereotypes that Brown students are too informed, too self-aware and too intelligent to find themselves as either the perpetrators or victims of sexual violence.

Especially when alcohol is involved, Brazzell said, “The biggest thing that is hard for people to understand is that there’s a spectrum of consent going from, ‘Yes, I really want to do this,’ to, ‘Okay, I’m not really sure about it, but I feel a lot of pressure,’ to some pretty strong coercion, to forcing someone.”

The idea of a continuum of sexual consent is an idea Josephson said he could get behind. But in the legal system, “there are different types of murder … but just one type of rape,” he critiqued.

For better or worse, where Adam Lack and Sara Klein’s encounter falls on the spectrum of consent remains a mystery.


To stay up-to-date, subscribe to our daily newsletter.

  1. tootsiepoo says:

    As a woman, I am not anti-feminist. I don’t oppose women’s rights to vote, work while having children, or be paid less than a man based on their gender. However, every time I hear about the Adam Lack case, I feel much sorrier for him than I do for Sara Klein. Here’s why.
    I’ve been to my fair share of parties. I also don’t really drink too much, I usually have a drink or so until I’m tipsy. My friends think I’m a weird self control freak, which I probably am, but whatever.
    As the girlfriend of a guy in one of the more prominent male-only social groups on campus, I’ve seen and heard of my fair share of hookups from the girls and guys alike. Most of the people I’m with at a Brown party are way drunker than I am. I see really drunk girls (some of whom are my friends, helping themselves to drink after drink, NOT mind you, being coerced into drinking by men) who wouldn’t normally hook up or have sex with a guy leave with them giggling, making out- definitely not saying no or giving any indication that they don’t want to hook up with them. The next day, they can’t believe that they got too drunk and had sex. Any girl who parties, you probably have yourself or have friends who have done this. It’s pretty common, unfortunately.
    I know that this is going to be a controversial thing to say, but it’s not the guy’s fault for having sex with these types of girls. If they are very drunk by their own means, making out, and one thing leads to another without either party protesting and both seem into it, how is that not consensual sex? Am I supposed to explicitly say “yes, I want to have sex with you” every time I have sex with my boyfriend? Is that what a guy needs to do with every drunk girl before he has sex with her? That seems like an unrealistic expectation…which would impact the flow of things if you know what I mean, ha.
    Moreover, if a guy doesn’t know the girl in question well, it can be hard to gage exactly how drunk she is. Boys aren’t mind readers; if a girl is really drunk by her own doing, she is still accountable for her actions as long as nothing is forced on her, and needs to take control of the situation. Everyone has their own type of drunk, and sometimes it can be tough to tell how drunk someone is until they starts vomiting everywhere. I also have noticed that if a guy gets too drunk and has sex with a girl who is perhaps a bit ‘below’ his standards, he tends to brush it off more than my female friends- an attitude of “oh yeah, haha, that was probably not a good decision, I was too piss drunk to get out of there” to his friends at brunch the next AM, while girls on the whole tend to get a bit more upset if they hook up with someone they really regret.

    Following the Lack incidence, the better thing to highlight would be not getting drunk to the point where you make these choices you profoundly regret. Yes, guys need to be told that having sex with a passed out girl or forcing themselves on an unwilling girl is rape, but from what I’ve seen, girls need to be held more accountable for their actions too.

    • Captain Nemo says:

      No one can give consent when intoxicated. Everyone needs to know that.

      If the person you want to “hook up” with is drunk, you must stop. Otherwise, you’re open to assault charges.

      Teach that to both men and women and a lot of this goes away.

      To me, the saddest part is that people still feel a need to get drunk to reduce their inhibitions enough to have sex. Lose the inhibitions without drugs, then go have all the sex you want!

  2. As a man and a Southerner and a putative Baptist and a Brown alumnus, I have little sympathy for Adam Lack. In the time and place I was raised, a gentleman would hold the door for and stand when a lady entered the room or left the table. To take advantage of a lady when she was even mildly intoxicated would be beyond the pale. I’m sure the many would not agree with the reasoning – yes, I was raised in a paternalistic society – but, I just want to point out that, to say this was PC gone amuck, is to ignore the history of Pembroke and Brown. I think everyone can agree he behaved in an ungentlemanly manner. To what degree this horrifies you is, I suppose, a matter of how you were raised.

    • BuckRogers says:

      The fact you have to virtue signal identifying as a Baptist tells me you should never be trusted, ever. Nor anyone of your kind.

  3. I don’t think that Lack’s intent was malicious, in that he planned on getting this woman intoxicated in order to facilitate a rape, but he should have been held culpable for his irresponsible choice to have sex with what was an obviously intoxicated woman, even if she came into his room and attempted to initiate sex with him. From what I’ve read of him, he wasn’t a manipulative person, he was a pretty good guy, as was the victim.

    If he indeed found Klein unconscious near her vomit, the responsible choice would have been to give her a glass of water, ask her if she was ok, and then lay her down *alone* or ask for assistance from one of her friends. Or to even call medical services if she seemed that ill (keep in mind, that an unconscious drunk can choke to death on their own vomit). I’m speaking as a man who has had intoxicated women get “handsy” with me, grab my body, tell me that they wanted me to f*ck them. The difference being that I’m not aroused by drunk or stoned women and I prefer that the women I’ve had sex with fully enjoy the experience, not regret it the following day or not remember it at all.

    As for Ms. Klein, as with anyone else who drinks to sever intoxication, the risks that with that choice are that you can become ill, unconscious, develop a bad hangover or even develop alcohol poisoning – not that someone gets to have sex with you while you’re in that state. Being “that girl” (whatever ill founded judgment of character that means) doesn’t give someone else a free pass to have sex with her without her sober, ongoing and enthusiastic consent. Most men who choose to drink to intoxication are not told that they’re “that guy”, that it’s their fault if someone goes and has sex with them without their consent. Or if they’re “that drunk guy” that they deserved to be robbed or abused in some fashion.

  4. Barry Schlosberg says:

    Chris Paxson asked BDH to put this article out, with the hope that her indecision and inaction would appear justified in light of her predecessor’s indecision and inaction. She is cynical and irresponsible.

Comments are closed. If you have corrections to submit, you can email The Herald at