Subscribe to The Brown Daily Herald Newsletter

Sign up for The Brown Daily Herald’s daily newsletter to stay up to date with what is happening at Brown and on College Hill no matter where you are right now!


University News

Corporation ties to student accused of serving GHB questioned

Charges dropped against Phi Psi member accused of giving drink with GHB after tests invalidated

University News Editor
Friday, March 6, 2015

The University dropped charges against a Phi Kappa Psi member alleged to have served a drink containing a date-rape drug. Several people voiced concerns that his ties to the Corporation affected the case’s outcome.

Individuals familiar with the case surrounding the alleged use of a date-rape drug raised concerns that the University may have unfairly handled the disciplinary proceedings due to the accused student’s family ties to the Corporation, according to sources and documents reviewed by The Herald.

Charges against the Phi Kappa Psi member who was accused of serving a drink containing GHB at an October party held by the fraternity were dropped Feb. 21 due to a lack of physical evidence.

A faculty member with knowledge of the case, the father of one of the two complainants and two members of the Task Force on Sexual Assault all expressed worry that the relationship between the accused student and his father, a Corporation trustee, may have influenced how the case unfolded.

None of the documents reviewed by The Herald point to specific instances of preferential treatment as a result of the accused student’s family connections, and no physical evidence publicly identified in the case has conclusively tested positive for GHB. But the concerns raised by individuals familiar with the situation have added to mounting pressure on the University over its handling of the case.

Administrators did not respond to multiple requests for comment, and the trustee did not return a call seeking comment by press time Friday morning.

After formally charging the student Dec. 10, the University scheduled a hearing for Dec. 19.

But following a court injunction filed by the student, the University was required to put the disciplinary proceedings on hold until the end of January, according to a Dec. 15 email to one of the two complainants from Yolanda Castillo-Appollonio ’95, associate dean of student life and director of student conduct.

The hearing was further delayed when an independent expert hired by the accused student called into question the accuracy of a GHB test originally found positive, according to a March 2 email from Castillo-Appollonio to one of the complainants. The expert, a professor at Tufts University School of Medicine, cast doubt on the urine test’s methodology.

Meanwhile, a Brown professor informally advising one of the two women, J. Timmons Roberts, spoke to Margaret Klawunn, vice president for campus life and student services, on Jan. 23.

“It sounds like the number of lawyers involved and the resources of (the accused student) have slowed and complicated this,” but administrators are moving as quickly as they can, wrote Roberts, professor of environmental studies and sociology, in an email to the complainant later that day.

On Feb. 7, the father of the other complainant wrote an email to Chancellor Thomas Tisch ’76 P’18 expressing concern about the accused student’s connection to the Corporation.

“My daughter has been involved in this process for over four months. This is a process that should have taken 60 days,” he wrote. “Having a very wealthy member of the Board of Trustees as a parent of (the accused student) raises the question if my daughter can get a fair hearing at Brown.”

Despite the Tufts professor’s assertion that the urine test might be inconclusive, the University was “prepared to proceed” with the hearing and hired its own independent toxicologist, Guy Vallaro, to reevaluate the urine and hair tests, according to Castillo-Appollonio’s March 2 email.

Acting on a report written by the independent toxicologist, the University announced Feb. 21 that the urine test was, in fact, inconclusive.

The accused student’s hearing was canceled that day due to the lack of conclusively positive physical evidence.

“What message have we sent by not holding a full and fair hearing against a student who is accused of drugging another?” Roberts wrote in an email to The Herald Thursday. “It potentially sends a message that some are above being subject to the rules.”

“We cannot build a community of trust at Brown with seeming impunity for some and impossible evidentiary standards,” he wrote. “If he is innocent, that should be borne out in a hearing.”

Phi Kappa Psi members vehemently defended the innocence of all the organization’s members in a letter to the community published by The Herald Oct. 28.

“Sexual assault and the use of illegal date-rape drugs number among the most heinous of crimes,” the fraternity’s members wrote. “We are confident that in no way did any member of Phi Kappa Psi engage in or perpetrate such atrocious and criminal behavior.”

Katie Byron ’15, a member of the Task Force on Sexual Assault, said that to her knowledge, the standard of evidence required to proceed with a hearing is if the alleged incident is “plausible.”

“In so many of these instances, there’s no evidence. There’s somebody who comes forward and discloses an experience, and for the most part, that person’s testimony is enough to warrant a hearing,” she said, characterizing the way this case was handled as “inconsistent” with others.

“It does concern me that that conflict of interest exists,” said Justice Gaines ’16, another member of the task force.

To stay up-to-date, subscribe to our daily newsletter.

  1. Student '15 says:


  2. Miriam Staffansdotter Langmoen says:

    The only word I can think of for this is “outrageous”.

  3. B.S. Alum '13 says:

    Brown, I love(d) you, but this is absolutely disgusting.

  4. Greek alum says:

    The university just decided that no rape happened but they are really still insisting that this kid at phi psi drugged the girl for no reason?

  5. 12maggie34 says:

    Your logic is specious. The truth exists. You make it sound like the truth in this case is some arcane mystery. It either happened or it didn’t. But because of this apparent conflict, one can argue that we may never know the truth because wealth, privilege, influence and access to power have reduced the transparency of this matter. That’s what rich people are able to do. The parent of a poor student (especially one who is not a corporation member) would never have been able to even think about influencing the outcome of a matter like this. So frankly it is the “Privilege” which creates the “bias”. Check your privilege and we will check our bias.

    • Nice assumption the Alum has privilege. Do you analyze everything from a starting point of no facts?

    • Tired Of Your Crap says:

      “Check your privilege” is a vacuous ad hominem – it gives accusers an excuse to stop thinking. Don’t like someone? Start acting like a bigot!

  6. Alum '13.5 says:


    on coal divestment, on date rape allegations


  7. Rape Survivor '11 says:

    Oh snap! I didn’t know Bill Cosby was a Brown Alum

  8. Yet another woman lying.

    • tiredofyourbull says:

      you literally need to stop and think about how triggering and disgusting this comment is. why on earth would a woman lie about being raped? there is absolutely nothing to gain. nothing. false rape accusations occur at the same rate as they do for any other crime. the rate is roughly 2%. THE SAME FOR ANY OTHER CRIME.

      • Alexander Baron says:

        Women lie about rape ALL THE TIME. Check out the timeIine I put together awhile back. All the time. Especially American students who have been brainwashed by the sisterhood.

  9. Greek Alum says:

    Do people on campus really think this guy randomly decided to drug this girl? Don’t get me wrong: I do think she was drugged. I just don’t see anything that supports that the phi psi guy did it and nothing to refute the idea that the student who raped* her did it.

    *not according to brown

  10. Troj Dweller says:

    Well, it would be a start if in saving a trustee’s family, we ditched Margaret Klawunn. It would not be ideal to stop at ditching Margaret Klawunn, but it would be a start.

  11. Many books and movies including Tucker Max, Mad Men, The Game, Sex and the City, Crazy Eyes, and Jersey Shore seem different these days. Tucker Max comes across as a misogynist who has sexually assaulted many women. The Game is all about misogynists. Jersey Shore… if Jersey Shore were it’s own coed frat, it would have been banned by now.

Comments are closed. If you have corrections to submit, you can email The Herald at