Faculty members: Support for Diversity and Inclusion Action Plan

Op-Ed Contributor
Monday, February 1, 2016

To our students, colleagues, and alums:

Brown University is at a crossroads.

The events of last semester have made it possible for the University to confront head-on persistent issues about equality, diversity and inclusion in its educational and organizational culture and to stage some profound conversations between different segments of the community. Before and after the President’s plan was released in late November, we all witnessed a torrent of letters, broadsides and lists of demands circulated by email, through the web and on old-fashioned paper. Students and faculty left for winter break agreeing that any plan formulated by the University for addressing issues of diversity and inclusion at Brown should be circulated and subject to discussion and response from the campus community before it was finalized. 

We write today as a group of concerned and now also hopeful faculty members to respond to the revised and re-released Diversity and Inclusion Action Plan. Since the initial draft of the DIAP was released we have met several times, in groups large and small, to share our own views and ideas about how best to support students and to consider ways in which we might facilitate forward movement. We have met with students, with other faculty members and with the administration. We have listened to the alums of our programs and concentrations. Some of us have written and spoken publicly about the issues that confront the University, while others have worked privately to counsel students and other faculty members. Collectively, we have for months been thinking about what the role of the faculty is, or can be, in wide-ranging, forward-looking conversations between the administration and students, and about how we might play an active role in these same conversations, too. As difficult as all of these discussions have been, though, we believe now that this process has resulted in a revised plan that is very encouraging and spotlights a path to make Brown an inclusive, thoughtful and more ethical community.

It is fair to say that none of us, in our collective decades of teaching at institutions of higher education, has seen a plan that is as comprehensive, ambitious and thorough as the one we have before us now. It seeks to implement promises made in previous years and then go further.

No plan, no administrative measure, is “perfect,” but perfection is generally not the standard by which we measure progress. Rather, we look at this plan and see a concerted effort on the part of Brown’s administration to listen and respond to the voices of the members of its community, to learn from those voices and to build a university that seeks to be more ethical and just. If this plan becomes practice, it will dramatically accelerate our ability to recruit the very best faculty of color, it will create new graduate fellowships for talented students from underrepresented minority groups, it will promote the professional development of our faculty members, students and staff members, it will invest departments in the entire process and it will support new academic programming that will speak to the entire campus — and Providence — community. It rests on the simple, powerful premise that excellence and diversity are not mutually exclusive, but instead are necessary complements.

The revised plan also includes detailed and transparent information about how the campus’ feedback to the original draft was received, processed and responded to. Some of us were able to read and discuss a preliminary revision, to suggest further refinement and to see the penultimate draft. At each step, we were able to see changes that reflected the interests of the larger campus. This, in itself, is remarkable, and it also speaks to the good faith in which all of the feedback was received. In addition to the inclusion of many suggestions made by faculty members, staff members and students in the revised DIAP, the revisions undertaken by the Provost and the President over winter break have increased the University’s commitment from $100 million to $165 million. If the original draft of the plan was intended to be comprehensive, this new, larger commitment better realizes those intentions and offers more than a mere symbolic promise.

If implemented wisely, thoroughly and to the finish, this revised plan promises nothing less than a very different, much bolder Brown in the future. It clears the ground for the Brown community to build a distinctive university/college, marking the opening of another possible period in the history of this institution, one in which the University looks and thinks and speaks like the world around it.

This is a promise we, as faculty members, want to bring to life.

The signatories on this letter by no means represent the entire faculty — there are many more who support the sentiments expressed here, and still many more with whom we will have more conversations in the weeks, months and years to come. Some have already been working over the last two months, in graduate committees, in classrooms and in discussions with undergraduates, to bring this vision of a more inclusive Brown to fruition. But we did wish to voice some thoughts on the revised DIAP in as timely a manner as possible, so that the Brown community could have a sense of how deeply many of its faculty members are invested in these issues. We are aware that there is a great deal to be done, and there will always be a great deal more to say. Most importantly, we now have a clear and hopeful sense of the work there is to do and of how we all may set about achieving it. 

We the undersigned have seen a draft form of the revised DIAP. We recognize that not all faculty have seen it, and we expect that now that it is public, many more of our colleagues will join us.


Leticia Alvarado, Assistant Professor of American Studies and Ethnic Studies

Anthony Bogues, Professor of Africana Studies and Director of the CSSJ

Lundy Braun, Professor of Pathology and Laboratory Med and Africana Studies

Cynthia Brokaw, Professor of History

Mark Cladis, Professor of Religious Studies

Beshara Doumani, Professor of History

Jim Egan, Professor of English

Robert Emlen, Senior Lecturer in American Studies

Paja Faudree, Associate Professor of Anthropology

Vazira Fazila-Yacoobali Zamindar, Associate Professor of History

Linford D. Fisher, Associate Professor of History

Olakunle George, Associate Professor of English

Matthew Pratt Guterl, Professor of Africana Studies and American Studies

Sherine Hamdy, Associate Professor of Anthropology

Françoise N. Hamlin, Associate Professor of Africana Studies and History

Susan Ashbrook Harvey, Professor of Religious Studies

Beverly Haviland, Associate Professor of American Studies

Elizabeth Hoover, Assistant Professor of American Studies and Ethnic Studies

Evelyn Hu-DeHart, Professor of History, American Studies, and Ethnic Studies

José Itzigsohn, Professor of Sociology

Nancy Jacobs, Associate Professor of History

Tamar Katz, Associate Professor of English

Michael D. Kennedy, Professor of Sociology and International and Public Affairs

Nancy Khalek, Associate Professor of Religious Studies

Daniel Y. Kim, Associate Professor of American Studies and  English

Robert G. Lee, Associate Professor of American Studies

Steven Lubar, Professor of American Studies and History

Richard Meckel, Professor of American Studies

Brian Meeks, Professor of Africana Studies

Monica Muñoz Martinez, Assistant Professor of American Studies and Ethnic Studies

Rebecca Nedostup, Associate Professor of History

Tara Nummedal, Associate Professor of History

Keisha-Khan Perry, Associate Professor of Africana Studies

Ethan Pollock, Associate Professor of History

Daniel A. Rodriguez, Assistant Professor of History

Ralph E. Rodriguez, Associate Professor of American Studies, Ethnic Studies, and English

Tricia Rose, Professor of Africana Studies and Director, CSREA

Robert Self, Professor of History

Naoko Shibusawa, Associate Professor of History and American Studies

Elena Shih, Assistant Professor of American Studies and Ethnic Studies

Susan Smulyan, Professor of American Studies

Tracey Steffes, Associate Professor of Education and History

Elmo Terry-Morgan, Associate Professor of Africana Studies and Theatre Arts and

Performance Studies

Daniel Vaca, Assistant Professor of Religious Studies

Michael Vorenberg, Associate Professor of History

Debbie Weinstein, Assistant Professor of American Studies

Andre C. Willis, Assistant Professor of Religious Studies

Patricia Ybarra, Associate Professor of Theatre Arts and Performance Studies

Samuel Zipp, Associate Professor of American Studies and Urban Studies

Please send responses to this opinion to letters@browndailyherald.com and other op-eds to opinions@browndailyherald.com.


  1. they’re protecting themselves… but from what?

  2. I wanted to congratulate the above faculty for their successful shakedown of a university in order to advance their political agenda. The university will now endowed with dozens of high paying faculty and administrative positions from which students and the rest of the faculty will now be bullied about the “privilege” “white supremacy” and “oppression” that is endemic on campus, in its dorms, classrooms, laboratories, and dining halls. Other university departments will now be forced to hire faculty members that meet their litmus tests of ideological and demographic purity. So I welcome the Brave New World that is coming to Brown U which will certainly bring the same utopia that was found during the Cultural Revolution.

  3. There are no faculty from the departments of math, science, engineering, etc. Why is that? Are they not down with the struggle? And where’s Bill Keach’s signature? He’s usually the first to storm the barricades of social injustice.

  4. William Chen says:

    I enjoy and gravitate towards reading about women, black, latino, and asian-american subjects but tenured women and ethnic studies are a waste of time since there is such an political bias in the readings. The bottom line in the readings is that whites are the problem and everything wrong can be reengineered by changing words around. The action plan is to force everyone to vote left-democratic.

    The new tenures seem to gravitate towards media and pop culture and present a very limited and narrow vision of humanity. There is very little room for real field experience or introspection in either women or ethnic studies that go against a leftist line. Women and ethnic studies are biased against conservatives, who are much better at protecting the traditional humanities and its legacy of human experience. It is conservatives who make community and strong marriages a theme in their works.

    This is too bad. Brown is a rich bubble and slowly becoming more irrelevant each year. The admissions rate and SATs might be higher than earlier years, but the connection with society and mainstream America gets weaker and weaker. Moreover, the deeper financial troubles of Rhode Island and the City of Providence gets marginalized.
    The new plan is way too much money for tenuring radicals and other people who wish to make war on society, mainstream opinion, and the average family.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *