Subscribe to The Brown Daily Herald Newsletter

Sign up for The Brown Daily Herald’s daily newsletter to stay up to date with what is happening at Brown and on College Hill no matter where you are right now!


News, University News

Study finds most hosted speakers lean left politically

Student coalition published report in hopes of fostering ideological diversity on campus

Senior Staff Writer
Monday, March 5, 2018

A coalition of students, working under a group called SPEAK, published a report last Tuesday that found 94.5 percent of speakers invited to Brown lean left ideologically.

Composed of 17 students who collected and analyzed the data for the study, SPEAK welcomed representatives of different groups on campus, such as No Labels at Brown, the Brown Republicans and the Brown chapter of the Alexander Hamilton Society, said Greer Brigham ’20, leader of SPEAK. The group’s recently published report also received endorsements from the Dialogue; the Brown Journal of Philosophy, Politics and Economics; the American Enterprise Institute at Brown; Brown Students for Israel; and various faculty and administrators,  he added.

Despite reaching out to liberal groups on campus, SPEAK’s endorsements largely come from center- and right-leaning groups, Brigham wrote in an email to The Herald. “We do have several endorsements from liberal professors. … In addition, the key members of our team (are) about 50-50 left and right.”

The project started as a way to figure out how to bring better balance to the dialogue on campus, said Alex Santangelo ’19, vice president of No Labels. Inspired by an idea presented at a No Labels meeting, SPEAK was formed as a coalition when the group realized that other organizations had similar goals, he added.

“We treated it like a social science question. … We collected data for it, we worked with some Brown professors checking the data (and) making sure it was accurate, and we’re now … publishing it,” Santangelo said. With the actual collection process beginning early last fall, the report covers all of the speakers invited to campus in 2017, he added.

For the report, the group examined speakers who had spent significant time in the United States and who weren’t considered event moderators, Brigham said. In determining where each speaker should be categorized on the political spectrum, the group used a number of metrics, including campaign contributions, social media statements and career positions that the speaker had previously held, he said. “Only when we were very confident … whether they were left or right, then we’d assign them,” he added.

In defining the boundaries of “left” and “right,” the group generally used the Democratic and Republican parties as proxies for these ideologies, Brigham said. “You can pull up (the speakers’) political contributions,” he said. “It’s easier to get hard data than … if you try to get their views on capitalism or something like that.”

Out of 237 speakers overall, 94.5 percent were identified as having a “left lean,” according to the published report. Even more specifically, out of the 198 speakers who specifically addressed topics related to American politics, 93.4 percent fell on the left side of the ideological spectrum. Addressing the fact that many invited speakers are college professors, a group that tends to be more liberal than the average population, the report also states that 92.3 percent of the 90 non-professor speakers in 2017 were left-leaning.

In response to these findings, Brian Clark, director of news and editorial development, reaffirmed the University’s commitment to hosting a wide variety of speakers. “Welcoming a broad diversity of perspectives on our campus — from students, faculty and staff or from those who visit campus — is fundamentally important to advancing our core mission of education and discovery,” he wrote in an email to The Herald. “The stated goal in the report of promoting greater engagement with ideologically diverse ideas is one that the University supports wholeheartedly.”

But Clark said the metrics used in the report, while depicting a left versus right analysis, fail to capture “in totality the richness and complexity of viewpoint diversity at Brown,” adding that the depth of ideas are rooted in more than just political ideology.“Every week, speakers from around the globe come to campus and offer distinctive views and perspectives informed by their experiences, expertise and scholarship. And there are routinely wide differences in viewpoints on topics expressed by different speakers, regardless of their perceived place on the political spectrum,” he wrote.

Edward Steinfeld, director of the Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs, expressed similar ideas in an email to The Herald. “We focus on public policy issues from an international and comparative perspective, so many of our speakers — and many of the topics we address — don’t naturally fit in a Democratic (versus) Republican or liberal (versus) conservative framework,” he wrote. He emphasized the Watson Institute’s continued commitment to “thorough discussion of global challenges.”

Through this project, SPEAK is hoping that real change can be effected on campus. During the fall semester, the coalition met with political groups, faculty members and campus administrators to get input on their process. These included leaders of the Taubman Center for American Politics and Policy and the Watson Institute, Brigham said. “We want the conversation to be within Brown. We’re just trying to figure out how to make this as productive as possible and actually have the University invite a more broad range of speakers,” he added.

For Santangelo, one of the purposes of the report has been to encourage the administration to create more diverse ideological conversations. “The ultimate goal is for the administration to understand … they need to do a better job of bringing a balance of perspectives,” he said.

Though Clark agrees that hosting a wide variety of views is important, he also noted that this responsibility is shared among the Brown community as a whole. “All members of the Brown community have the right to invite and host speakers of their choice on campus to advance and debate ideas,” he wrote. “Members of the Brown community turn that responsibility into action every day, and the lineup of events and speakers nearly every week of the semester makes that clear.”

The overarching goal for the project has been to spark dialogue about the ideas being shared on campus, Santangelo said. “We just want to bring balance to the type of speakers that are coming here and what’s being discussed. … We’re highlighting a national problem but keeping it to Brown.”

To stay up-to-date, subscribe to our daily newsletter.

  1. Ron Ruggieri says:

    This so called LEFT is vaguely defined in the mainstream news media . So far right has the American ruling class moved since the Reagan era that they succeeded in making LIBERAL a dirty word . Students should study the LEFT of the 1930s for some real perspective on what it means today to be a ” leftist “. So many who describe themselves as ” leftists ” are a long way from radical socialism – a complete rejection of the CAPITALIST way of life. The Old Left focused on economic inequality , on raising the CLASS consciousness of the working class. Do you really think that Senators Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren have any claim on the legacy of the American socialist Eugene V. Debs – who said that the only just war is CLASS WAR ?
    Right wing talk radio places quite moderate Democrats ” on the Left ” : Warren and Sanders are ” far left ” from their position in right field . Yet Warren and Sanders make no appeals to working class militancy . They are solicitous for the stressed out American middle class : ” Save the middle class ! ” they cry. They pretend that they can do this without even stepping on the toes of the American plutocracy . And what kind of American ” left ” is it that silenced the anti-war movement , promoting the HATE RUSSIA New McCarthyism ?
    The Old Left can only laugh sardonically at self-described ” socialists ” who reject SOCIALISM . They are not even patient Fabian socialists like H.G. Wells . In truth SOCIALISM is never on the their agenda .
    The so called Left in America is besotted with political correctness and vicious identity politics . They ignore CLASS and pander to race , gender , and sexual orientation. This Left appeals mostly to ambitious, social climbing, petty bourgeois college students.
    Presently the American pseudo-Left imagines that the NRA is the root of all evil. But if ” weapons of war ” are hidden in upper class homes , this is explained by news media neglect of the CLASS WAR . The nervous bourgeoisie and the affluent middle class fear for their PRIVATE PROPERTY and class privilege. The ” criminal class ” might get out of control . They need BIG GOVERNMENT only for their capitalist police state and for nuclear World War III ( which they think will make the American Empire great again ) .
    Our two party system offers no ” democracy ” to 100 million working class Americans. WE can replace it with an American Labor Party. WE can stop World War III !

Comments are closed. If you have corrections to submit, you can email The Herald at