Subscribe to The Brown Daily Herald Newsletter

Sign up for The Brown Daily Herald’s daily newsletter to stay up to date with what is happening at Brown and on College Hill no matter where you are right now!



Gantz ‘17.5: Mid-year graduation ignores medical leave-takers

op-ed contributor
Tuesday, December 6, 2016

For two consecutive years, the mid-year graduation ceremony has ignored — and thus invalidated — the experiences of medical leave-takers who comprise a substantial number of the mid-year graduating class.

According to the Office of Student Life website, there were 85 medical leaves of absence in the 2015-2016 academic year. The Curricular Resource Center reports that every year about 200 Brown students take a leave of absence. This means that medical leave-takers comprised approximately 42.5 percent of leave-takers this past academic year. It was difficult to find the exact percentage of students who are out on medical leave currently or the percentage of mid-year graduates who took a medical leave, but it is still reasonable to suggest that the ceremony ignored the experiences of a significant number of students in the audience.

At the 2016 mid-year graduation ceremony, both President Christina Paxson P’19 and Dean of the College Maud Mandel used the ceremony to congratulate Brown on its open curriculum and apparent flexibility, rather than appreciate the variety of experiences of the students the ceremony supposedly celebrates. Importantly, both Paxson and Mandel ignored the experiences of medical leave-takers. The administrators maintained the narrative that point-fivers represent the traditional Brown experience because apparently point-fivers are the embodiment of students who embrace the freedom to craft their own educations. They failed to recognize that many students who are graduating mid-semester did not intend  to graduate late or have any interest in doing so, but did so as a result of medical issues, financial hardships or other unpreventable circumstances.

Students graduate mid-semester for a variety of reasons, Mandel said, whether it be due to transferring from a different institution, deciding to take time off or experiencing a “bump in the road” in their education. The notion of a traditional educational “road” is ableist and classist. The experiences of hundreds of students were carelessly dismissed in this one sentence by the dean as simply a “bump.” Why is it that the experiences of mentally ill or financially burdened students cannot also be considered normal and acceptable educational experiences?

The student speakers spoke brilliantly this year and last. But for two consecutive years, the mid-year graduation ceremony has refrained from highlighting (or even acknowledging) the experiences of medical leave-takers. Instead, only students who decided to take time off to enrich their Brown experience are featured at the ceremony. This would be fine if only the event acknowledged in some other way that this is not the experience of every student.

Some graduating students in that audience did not spend their time off enriching their Brown experience or pursuing professional goals. In fact, many did not do anything related to their experience at Brown. Many went home, worked in coffee shops or went to therapy, and many spent as much time away from Brown as they needed to regain their health. Though this narrative is evidently perceived as less glamorous — as evidenced by the refusal to acknowledge it at the ceremony — it is the reality for many students and should be celebrated, supported and validated in the same way.

No component of the ceremony acknowledged that medical leave-takers often do not want to take time off, and some are forced to take a leave involuntarily. Many medical leave-takers do not see their experience away from Brown as a time of growth or understanding, though the administrators implied this is true for every mid-year graduate.

The structure and content of the past two mid-year ceremonies has encouraged an ableist, neuronormative mindset that ignores the realities of a large number of students who take time off. By failing to acknowledge the experiences of many point-fivers, Brown is essentially affirming that individuals who are mentally and physically ill do not conform to the vision of what it means to be successful at Brown.

Historically, Brown’s policies on leave-taking and readmission have burdened students who have needed to take time off for medical reasons. Therefore, it is unsurprising that Brown continues to devalue such students even at a ceremony that exists to celebrate their accomplishments. When I graduate next December, I would like to see the mid-year ceremony be more representative of the true experiences of my ’17.5 class.

Lindsay Gantz ’17.5 can be reached at Please send responses to this op-ed to and other op-eds

To stay up-to-date, subscribe to our daily newsletter.

  1. Anonymouspointfiver says:

    While I appreciate your effort to render the mid-year graduation ceremony more inclusive, I doubt this kind of attention to medical leave would accomplish that task in a meaningful or sensitive way.

    As a transfer student and point-fiver myself, I can tell you that there is significant crossover (far more than you’d imagine) between transfers and medical leave. Many students transfer to Brown because of traumatic experiences at their previous colleges, seeking the opportunity to start fresh at a new school. Transferring to Brown is not always about finding a better “fit”; often it is a means of escaping whatever discomfort or trauma we faced beforehand, and this doesn’t preclude the many transfer students who ALSO take medical leaves both before and during their time at Brown. Transfer or not, medical leave and histories before Brown are not always cathartic experiences and tales of growth, and perhaps some mid-year graduates would like to get through a two-hour graduation ceremony without revisiting them.

    You say “No component of the ceremony acknowledged that medical leave-takers often do not want to take time off, and some are forced to take a leave involuntarily.” While this is undoubtedly true, I can’t imagine why Paxson ought to explicitly mention it at graduation. The mid-year ceremony is intended to celebrate our unique journeys at Brown, despite whatever obstacles we may have encountered along the way. Few universities even offer a mid-year ceremony, and I for one was pleased to see Paxson acknowledge these journeys are equally important, meaningful, and valuable without delving into the specifics. She didn’t need to mention my manic depression and the extra 6 months it took me to graduate for me to feel included. To argue that “Brown is essentially affirming that individuals who are mentally and physically ill do not conform to the vision of what it means to be successful at Brown” is a blatant misrepresentation of what Paxson conveyed in her narrative. If anything, her “bump in the road” narrative stresses the value in completing one’s education according to their unique timeline. I can agree that I would’ve like to see more diverse student speakers (not just those who crafted their own concentration or took extra courses), but I have no desire whatsoever to indulge the various horrors that resulted in an unnecessary extension of my education. This op-ed seems like unnecessary picking at both Paxson and a genuinely well-intentioned ceremony that brings a little joy to us point-fivers.

Comments are closed. If you have corrections to submit, you can email The Herald at