Subscribe to The Brown Daily Herald Newsletter

Sign up for The Brown Daily Herald’s daily newsletter to stay up to date with what is happening at Brown and on College Hill no matter where you are right now!


Columns, Opinions

Fernandez ’21: Puerto Rico Self Determination Act: A Step Towards Liberation

Staff Columnist
Thursday, September 24, 2020

This week marked three years since Hurricane María made landfall in Puerto Rico on September 20, 2017. It is a moment during which painful memories of collective trauma flood the minds of many Puerto Ricans, demanding that communities meaningfully reflect on where they are now and how they got there. 

Over the last three years, we have seen historic moments of solidarity and action that have sparked genuine hope for radical political change that would provide effective relief efforts, amongst other urgent needs. However, this week I am reminded that Puerto Ricans will not see truly meaningful change until its persisting colonial status is dismantled – an ideal that the average Puerto Rican has long been taught to consider impossible by the actors behind the colonial project. It was in the midst of this disheartening reminder that I encountered the Puerto Rico Self Determination Act of 2020, introduced to Congress on August 25. While the Act is flawed in important ways, its introduction sparks an essential conversation on the importance of radically redefining Puerto Rico’s relationship to the United States and what is politically imaginable for Puerto Rico and its people, who have been fighting for liberation from colonial rule (under the United States and Spain) for centuries. 

Since 2017, Puerto Rico has found itself struggling to survive amidst multiple and simultaneous crises, ranging from economic disaster and political corruption to the failed reconstruction after not only Hurricane María, but also the devastating 2020 earthquakes that destroyed homes and livelihoods. Today, Puerto Rico, like the rest of the world, struggles to contain the COVID-19 pandemic, an endeavor made complicated by the lack of political and economic autonomy that restricts the island’s ability to take essential steps like provide support for its businesses and close its borders. Moreover, Puerto Rico is in the midst of its election season in which the island’s people will finally get to choose who will succeed former Governor Ricardo Rosselló, who was forced to resign by the historic social movement that took place in 2019. We are seeing a Puerto Rican public more politically activated than any I’ve seen in my lifetime, certainly driven by the political momentum gained in 2019 and by the incredible stakes created by this series of crises. However, regardless of my excitement around the upcoming election, I understand that the root of Puerto Rico’s state of emergency cannot be addressed entirely through internal politics on the island. It is here that I turn to the Puerto Rico Self Determination Act of 2020. 

The Act was introduced by Rep. Nydia Velázquez (NY-7) and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (NY-14). The bill intends “to recognize the right of the People of Puerto Rico to call a Status Convention through which the people would exercise their natural right to self-determination.” Puerto Rico and the U.S. Congress have toyed with similar proposals for decades, but the introduction of this act is a significant moment of tangible action. A Status Convention would allow Puerto Rican residents to elect delegates who would develop a proposal for changing the current Commonwealth Status of Puerto Rico, which would be submitted first to the Puerto Rican people for ratification and then to Congress for approval. 

This has been presented as an alternative to the referendum proposal that has dominated the question of Puerto Rico’s status for recent years, in which Puerto Ricans are asked to vote on a limited set of status options in non-binding elections. There is another referendum set to take place this November in which Puerto Ricans will be asked to vote “Yes” or “No” on the question “Should Puerto Rico be immediately admitted into the Union as a state?” The referendum process is nonsensical in many ways. These electoral exercises have been plagued by corruption and low voter participation, they exclude alternative options – namely, independence – they go largely ignored by Congress and they do not allow for any genuine participation from the Puerto Rican people in defining the future of the island. The Status Convention provides a promising alternative that ameliorates many of these pitfalls by foregrounding the need for radically representative and deliberative participation on the part of the Puerto Rican people. 

While I am excited about the possibilities of this proposal, I maintain several reservations about what a Status Convention of this structure would look like. The first and most important of these reservations is that this Act maintains the position of Congress as the sole sovereign over Puerto Rico. Requiring that Congress ratify the proposed new status definition developed by the Convention, a ratification process that supersedes that of the Puerto Rican people, calls into question whether or not we can even truly call this a move towards self-determination. Secondly, I have found a concerning absence of the voices of political organizers and activists currently fighting for liberation in Puerto Rico in the conversations around this proposal. Activists in Puerto Rico have an incredibly nuanced understanding of the political possibilities on the island. They are often weary of this kind of top-down proposal, recalling how the U.S. has time and again pretended to implement democratic procedures for Puerto Ricans that have turned out to only maintain the same colonial power structures. At the same time, these procedures have been    used to declare “consent of the governed” and justify the persisting exploitative relationship between the United States and Puerto Rico. Some activists maintain that no solution proposed by Congress will provide genuine self-determination, and, furthermore, that self-determination will only be achieved through revolutionary processes. Finally, while I appreciate the gesture of Reps. Velázquez and Ocasio-Cortez, I am skeptical of the feasibility of this proposal, for while Puerto Rico has never been a priority of U.S. politics, the current crises taking over the United States today make it even less so. 

Despite the ways that this proposal falls short, I remain hopeful about what it means for the future of Puerto Rico. While I maintain that any genuine change in Puerto Rico needs to be driven by those doing the work on the island today, I understand that in order to dismantle something as great as a centuries-long legacy of colonial occupation, people of all walks of life  need to apply pressure at all junctures of the colonial infrastructure. This necessarily includes having advocates in Congress who are willing to push the issue of Puerto Rican status to the forefront of lawmakers’ agenda. It must also include voters in the United States, who find themselves in the position to speak for the Puerto Rican who is formally voiceless and disenfranchised. Finally, it requires that activists in the United States, who today see themselves activated and their voices heard to an unprecedented extent, work towards building solidarity with the struggle in Puerto Rico as they have done for decades. The struggle for liberation is futile if it does not call for the liberation of all peoples. There is much to be learned, shared and accomplished through this intersectional solidarity, and Puerto Ricans, like so many others in this country and around the world, have been waiting for change for far too long.

To stay up-to-date, subscribe to our daily newsletter.

  1. RAFAEL FLORES says:

    It is very ironic to read how the author refers to the relationship between the US and Puerto Rico as a “persisting exploitative relationship”. This leades me to ask what have the US “exploited” Puerto Rico for? What resources has the US extracted from Puerto Rico at lower than market rates, unfairly compensating Puerto Rico? Has it been a mineral? Oil? Labor? I struggle to find the resource that the US has exploited Puerto Rico for.

    While I do agree that Puerto Rico has been a colony since 1492 (first of Spain, then of the US), I also think that Puerto Rico has gained in the relationship with the US. In fact, we are in fact demanding more participation from the US ($’s) in order to solve our economic crisis, as well as the issues related to Hurricane Maria and the recent earthquakes. We are not looking for Spain’s or France’s, or Mexico’s help. We are looking for more help from the US.

    Yes, we should be looking for a referendum in which to express our desire for self-determination. But I guarantee the writer that this desire will not be the independence of Puerto Rico but for a similar relationship with the US as the other 50 states enjoy. We are citizens of the US but we do not have the same rights as the other 50 states residents. As I recall, the pro-independence movement of Puerto Rico does not even achieve 5% in each election.

    So, enough of the talk about the independence for Puerto Rico. It is time everyone starts talking about what puerto ricans have many times already voiced: a permanent union to the US with equal rights as all other states.

  2. Question: “A permanent union to the US with equal rights as all other states” would be accomplished via statehood for Puerto Rico or by some other arrangement?

  3. RAFAEL FLORES says:

    Definitely via statehood. One of the arguments against statehood I have always heard is that our cultural identity as puerto ricans would be lost within the vast ocean of the US. There is nothing further from the truth. The greatest benefit of statehood is the vote for the President of the US (POTUS). As a state, PR would be represented in Congress by 2 Senators and about 7 Representatives. That is more than several current states like Rhode Island, Delaware, both Dakotas, Montana, Wyoming, to name a few. So, in the natural process of the campaign, the candidates for POTUS would potentially visit PR more and more often than any of the states with less than 7 respresentatives. The only thing that they would visit PR is to make promises. Should the candidate be elected, those promises made would have to be delivered. Should they not be delivered, the next time they would be up for re-election for POTUS, we would not vote for them. And our electoral weight would be very heavy. We could essentially decide the POTUS elections.

    We could steer these “promises” in whatever direction we want. We would still be the people of Puerto Rico. We would not be assimilated within the US. So, anything goes.

    As a resident of New Jersey and close proximity to the New York City, I live in an eternal experiment of how the latinos of this community are slowly taking over this great city. In fact, you don’t have to speak a word of english to enjoy all the benefits of NYC. You can go to any restaurant, you can go to any entertainment venue, you can go to any sports arena, and talk 100% spanish and you will be spoken spanish back. We are taking over. In fact, the assimilation is working in reverse.

    So, enough of the fear that identity would be lost. I have found in NYC more lechon, arroz con gandules, arroz con habichuelas, y tostones than any San Juan barrio. Our identity is too strong as a people and will never be assimilated.

    Welcome all of the benefits that statehood will bring with the safety that we will remain as puerto ricans as we are today but with a lot more resources and the hope of delivered promises.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *