President Ruth Simmons' comments last week before the Greater Providence Chamber of Commerce demonstrate a healthy and thriving relationship between the University and local business interests - one that is vital to the success of Brown's initiatives under the Plan for Academic Enrichment. As both Brown and Providence undertake ambitious proposals to expand existing programs and develop new ones, it is important that the efforts of these two forces do not counteract one another. Studies like the recent economic impact analysis take an important step toward critical thinking about how Brown's resources can supplement Providence's economic resurgence.
That said, it is important to remember that a city's progress is ultimately reflected in the prosperity of its inhabitants. As they highlight Brown's impact on Providence, both city officials and the University might be sacrificing less flashy amenities - like housing and public schools - in favor of construction projects, research facilities and startup companies.
Roughly 40 percent of Providence households cannot afford their current residences, a fact often cited by supporters of a citywide inclusionary zoning ordinance. Such a measure would force all new residential construction projects to designate a certain portion (likely between 10 and 20 percent) of units as affordable.
Supporters of the ordinance have repeatedly demonstrated their willingness to cater to business interests in crafting a mutually beneficial strategy. These advocates support incentives that would allow developers to continue making profits even as they address the needs of Providence's diverse population.
Those skeptical of inclusionary zoning, including Mayor David Cicilline '83 himself, say they fear such an ordinance would compromise the city's appeal to potential investors and slow down "overall growth," as one mayoral spokesman stated.
University administrators and city officials should pause and reflect on what "overall growth" actually entails. If it is restricted to commercial developments and expensive downtown investments, then perhaps the lack of focus on issues like inclusionary zoning has some merit. But if "overall growth" engages everyone with a stake in the success of Providence, then more attention should be placed on the city's residents. The University should strive for partnerships that extend beyond commercial interests and benefit the entire city, thereby ensuring that longtime residents benefit from - and are not displaced by - Providence's recent economic progress.
