To The Editor:
I read The Herald’s recent article “Scholars grapple with future of Israel studies in two-day conference” with interest. It was reported that some perceived an element of bias in the program. I’d like to offer comments from the perspective of Jewish tradition.
Study and learning have long been considered priorities of Jewish practice, extending back to the origin of the Talmud nearly two millennia ago. Yeshivas, seminaries and, indeed, universities are respected and often revered within the Jewish community. A fundamental process of Jewish study is known as “machloket l’shem shamayim,” or argument for the sake of heaven, a concept that closely parallels academic integrity. There are several fundamental components to this character of argument. First, the goal is to seek truth rather than victory. Second, participants must have respect for opposing arguments and opposing individuals. Lastly, those participating must be open to new ideas and modes of thinking. A desired result is one where individuals learn from each other and shake hands at the end.
It may be that this standard of discourse was met at this Israel-focused conference at Brown, and that some individuals’ displeasure or disagreement is part of the ebb and flow of controversial interplay. Having said that, we should ensure that the principles of machloket l’shem shamayim apply to the Israel-Palestine debate at Brown, such that all reasonable positions are treated impartially and respected. In today’s political climate, these conferences can serve as an example to those who are empowered, to best serve the common good.
Sincerely,
Alan Cole ’73 MD’76
